I understand your frustration (better than you think!
I’ve a loved one with diabetes, am familiar with the sticks, and more. Nothing like a late night ambulance call!)

…and I will listen back to the piece, but my intent was to mention diabetes because it is being talked about in relation to the new wellness proposals, and further, I mentioned it as an example of something that people often have no control over!

And David Hilzenrath’s response was that there would be a medical exception if someone couldn’t contol an issue, but he also had a warning that some providers might ask patients to, say, better control blood sugar levels. I don’t think he was advocating for that but rather warning about it!

I’ll listen back, but I in fact I think the spirit of the report was, well, the same spirit as your note!
Maybe diabetics SHOULD be up in arms over this.

All best,
Robin

But I must voice my opinion regarding this story.

For the record I:
1)support the need for national healthcare reform.
2)am a diabetic (Type 1 insulin dependent).
3)have expensive healthcare insurance.

I also appreciate the need to inform the many others who would support this type of program in order to keep their healthcare costs down. Unfortunately they don’t necessarily have all the correct and accurate information available as they consider the ramifications suggested by those that support these types of programs.

My problem is the way both Hilzenrath and Young seemed to over simplifiy diabetes while exploring the bigger question of “Wellness Programs” and their future role in healthcare reform.

Diabetics and the many others with chronic health issues should all be up in arms over this.
Type 1 diabtics have no control and certainly didn’t sign on for this one.

The ability to improve compliance in dealing with any disease an possibly lower health care costs may be possible. But when that individual wakes up tomorrow and has to deal with “finger sticks”, injections, meds, diet, and cost just survive is a daunting task.
Type II (non-insulin dependent) is different yet still carries many of the same issues.

Insurance companies and employers are looking to improve their performance with the real potential to harm their insured, many of whom have had no say in their current medical condition.

Think about that the next time you eat…

Need to figure out……..

Hm……..Carbs??? How many…….

Don’t know how to count carbs???????????
Too bad ………

Sounds easy…….Ouch…. next injection………

No injection…….. Oh well.

Probably not your best example/choice for this story.

Provide your people with accurate information before putting them on the “air” so the public will better understand the real-life demands of dealing with a life long, chronic diease.

Fred Thompson